Archive for June, 2008

Modern Romance (TQP #0034)

Posted in Jeff Holland with tags , on June 12, 2008 by braak

(Posted By Jeff Holland)

A couple of weeks ago, in a single day, I stumbled across two “Weird News”-style stories regarding people claiming to have sexual relations with things that one cannot, strictly speaking, actually make love to.

The first was about a man who boasted of a long-term romantic relationship with his car. The second discussed a woman swearing she was married to the Berlin Wall.

Now, it would be easy to ridicule these people as being perhaps a bit mentally unbalanced.

Put another way, it would be so, soooo easy to ridicule them as being absolute crackpots. Fun, too.

Put yet a third way, I cannot believe I’m not spending more time making fun of these two.

But this is a place for discourse, dammit, not puerile schoolboy name-calling (“car-humper,” “wall-hag,” and so on). Which meant I had to wait for something to come along and put things into a different perspective for me.

Fortunately I didn’t have to wait too long for a story about lesbian albatrosses to emerge.

This is not the first instance of homosexuality in the animal kingdom (though I still don’t recommend googling it at work). Honestly, it feels like lately we’re hearing about same-sex animal pairings at least twice a year.

(Granted, even in the animal kingdom, there are a few deviant personalities – for instance, the infamous rape-seal, pictured – but don’t interrupt, I’m on a roll.)

We’re only starting to understand that we’re the bullet fired out of the gun called the 21st century. Our ideas about every aspect of our culture and desires have to evolve at a frenetic pace just so we can hope to understand this period in time. And our grasp on sex is no exception. Even the animal kingdom is shifting its idea of what constitutes a valid partner – and in the process, is doing a better job of countering the average backwoods argument of “It just ain’t natural!” than even the most flamboyant gay pride parade could hope to do.

Can we really say it’s not time for the human race, with our far more impressive brains and complex desires, to redefine our very concept of sexuality outside of the plain old, boring-ass, vanilla humanity?

Which is not to say we should listen to the bestiality advocates. Future or not, the definition of a sexual partnership is willing consent, and the average golden retriever can’t really offer that. So for the ethical lover, animals are still off-limits.

But maybe car-humper and wall-hag are on to something. After all, the VW bug and the Berlin Wall can’t really have opinions on who wants to get amorous with them, right? Otherwise, they’d be teases. And if it’s all the same to you, I wouldn’t like to think of the Berlin Wall that way.

As I’ve written about previously, Japan is working like hell on humanoid robots, so how far away are we, really, from human-robot coupling? Maybe car-humper and wall-hag are just early adopters. Forerunners of a sexual revolution the rest of us can’t possibly comprehend at this point.

Or possibly, yes, they’re just absolute bat-shit-grade nutter-butters.

But perhaps that’s for history to decide.

Also, occasionally, the courts.

Vote For the Pretty One (TQP #0033)

Posted in Jeff Holland, Politics with tags , on June 11, 2008 by braak

(Posted By Jeff Holland)

1960: Kennedy and Nixon have a televised debate. Kennedy looks and sounds like a sharp, jet-setting man of the future. Nixon looks and sounds very much like a sweating corpse who is thinking about stealing your wallet. If you asked people who listened to the debate on the radio, the general consensus was that the debate was Nixon’s. But more people watched on TV. And through the sheer power of image, as far as they were concerned, Kennedy won.

1996: Bill Clinton stands next to Bob Dole. I do not believe I have to say anything else here.

2000: Al Gore tries like hell to shed the image of himself as a stiff, a robot. He comes up with the clever idea of wearing a flannel shirt. George W. Bush, meanwhile, in affected Texan twang, arm-swinging gait, and “You just say somethin’ ‘bout me, boy?” squint, is telling you all you need to know: He is a cowboy. And look, debate the legitimacy of the Florida results all you want – that’s the guy who ended up in office.

2004: In a mind-bending turn of events, the Democrats have learned nothing from 2000, and put up as their candidate a man who not only looks more stiff and lifeless than Al Gore, he also seems to have an attack-badger stapled to his head. To combat this perception, war veteran John Kerry tries putting out the image of himself as a man of action – by wind-surfing. Meanwhile, George W. Bush has upgraded his look from cowboy to cowboy/fighter pilot. And FUCKING WINS IT AGAIN.

2008: Barack Obama wins the democratic nomination in a packed St. Paul arena. He looks, for all the world, like a rock star this night. If you were to ask single women or gay men you knew, it is entirely likely they would tell you that if Barack Obama had asked them? They may very well have had sex with him.
That very same night, John McCain delivered a sparsely-attended speech in front of a horrifically unflattering green backdrop. The backdrop brings out every liver spot on his forehead, and a smile that’s meant to be warm and reassuring instead displays these tiny yellow things we’re told are teeth. He blinks fiercely every time his TelePrompter scrolls up a line.

Never forget that as long as there has been broadcast television, politics – particularly presidential politics – have been very much about image. They should be about other things. But they’re not. Not nearly enough, anyway. This race will be the most image-conscious in recorded history. Which is exciting, and also absolutely brain-melting if you stop to consider just how little it matters (suggestion: do not stop to consider this, or blood will just shoot right out your nose).

This upcoming race is going to be fascinating in terms of how the candidate’s look and sound will affect the message the voting public receives. Obama’s youth against McCain’s age could send a message of vitality, or it could enforce McCain’s hope that he’ll come across as looking more experienced (at the very least his face tells voters, “It’s not the age, it’s the mileage”).

In terms of sound, McCain clearly struggles with a prompter, and when he gets off-book…well, he may end up singing “Bomb Iran” as a Beach Boys tune. Obama, meanwhile, is a born orator – but I have seen him occasionally masking visible frustration at inane questions (“No flag pin, eh? Why do you hate America?”). And he’s got months of them to get through. He also has to display an ability to confidently sum up complex economic and foreign policies without an ounce of nuance or detail – or it may play like he’s not entirely clear on what his policies will achieve.

My biggest worry – for both candidates, really – is that they’ll get caught on TV doing something stupid that is in no way representative of them as people or candidates, but hell, cable news has 24 FREAKING HOURS to fill, so whatever imagery they latch on to, they dig their hooks in deep. I’m talking about windsurfing, or driving a tank, or awkwardly kissing a spouse.

So Obama? No more bowling. And McCain? Uhm…you may want to ask your tech people what kind of filter they use on Barbara Walters.

I want a good clean fight, gentlemen. BREAK!

Updates, Assorted (TQP0032)

Posted in Braak with tags , on June 10, 2008 by braak

I received my check from the government, that is meant to stimulate the economy by encouraging me to buy things. I imagine most people are just going to use it to pay off their credit card debt, which means it won’t really stimulate the economy, it’ll just make up for the excessive economic stimulation that we had three years ago. Also, is it my imagination, or does the phrase “stimulate the economy” seem dirtier every time I say it?

Anyway, I’ve avoided credit card debt for the last five years by living in abject poverty. With my government check I:

1) Bought groceries consisting, for the first time in a while, of foods that are prepared in a method other than “add boiling water.”

2) Bought socks and underwear for the first time in…longer than I’m comfortable admitting. Socks and underwear always feels like I task that I shouldn’t have to do regularly. Like it’s something that I can just do and then have it be done, and never have to think about buying socks and underwear ever again.

3) Will probably get a tattoo. A basic familiarity with American industry reveals that the only products that are wholly American are shitty beers, decent guns, and prostitutes. I don’t really need any of these things; I think a tattoo is probably a good way to keep the dollars in the economy.

The rest of the money is going to charities, because FUCK YOU, THE GOVERNMENT. All these people out here needing help, and all these people out here trying to help them, and your first thought is, “Fuck, people aren’t buying enough stupid crap. How can we get them to keep buying stupid crap?” Send me your economists by the dozens, I don’t care, I will headbutt them all, in order of height. You will never convince me that the way that we solve any problem, anywhere, is by convincing people to buy stupid crap. Except, obviously, the problem of “people aren’t buying enough stupid crap,” but that’s a circular argument.

On a side note: I have begun, and am about halfway through, Mary Doria Russel’s The Sparrow.

Oh my god, this book is so good. It reminds me of when I read Gene Wolf the first time, only it’s more approachable, more familiar. I will probably post something about it when I’m finished.

–braak

If Music Be The Food of Love Then It’s Time to Try the South Beach Diet (TQP0032)

Posted in Adam Lipschutz with tags on June 10, 2008 by braak

I have decided to give away all of my CD’s…maybe. Don’t come over to collect them just jet I haven’t made up my mind. I have more than 180 CD’s that I have collected over the past 15 years. I couldn’t possibly begin to guess how many different times I’ve moved in that time (at least four in the last three years) at I have carried them with me in each move, Re-alphabetizing them each time they find their way to a new home.

It used to be something of an obsession with, keeping them in pristine condition, carefully catalogued first by artist and then by chronology. But slowly over the last couple of months I have become very careless about where I lay them. There is a small stack on my CD player, several have been in my car for weeks, even more have been eaten by the travel binder that lies with the lost paper work and forgotten laundry pile on the futon chair that my brother to me on the promise that I would never attempt to return it.

I used to consider my CD collection to be an ever growing monument to my unique, eclectic and frankly superior tastes in music. Many of the CD’s were bought with the sole directive of impressing women, but it wasn’t until I had already spent several years and probably hundreds of dollars on things like Celtic Dulcimer music and Gregorian chanting that I unraveled the secret that once I got the women into my bedroom to see my music collection, the collection itself was probably irrelevant. So my best bet was to try approaching strange women at bars and say something like, “I have three Echo and the Bunnymen CD’S.”

SO until recently I have come to dread the coming of the new audio format which would render my lifetime of collecting music obsolete. I shared this fear with my brother (The same one who gave me the futon chair) and he assured me that nothing would soon replace the compact disc. They are simple, portable, offer as much length as most artists are willing to produce and frankly no one wants to have to buy The White Album again so my collection is safe.

Safe that is from everything except for deterioration. I recently pulled from off my shelf a copy of Dylan’s, “Blonde on Blonde” one of about 75 CD’s that I consider to be my absolute favorite and was horrified to find that despite the rigorous care and devotion that I have given to my collection, there were smudges on it!!! How on Earth could this have happened. Who other than me has been touching my CD’s. Furthermore my Neil Young Harvest CD is missing since God knows how long, and my Velvet Underground self title CD skips all the “Waiting for my Man.”

So finally I got an ipod and I think I will try to inch closer to Zen transcendence by giving away all of my CD’s…maybe. I haven’t made up my mind. Is going all digital the wave of the future. Should I chuck my CD’s and player, by a pair of high fidelity computer speakers and simply play everything out of the itunes on my Macbook? I will I want explore this issue from all sides hear the every opinion; all pros and cons. Is there any reason to own CD’s in the 21st century. Have a lifetime of collection is at stake. Although one thing is for certain, no matter what conclusion I come to I am keeping “Exile on Mainstreet” as well as about 74 others.

–Adam Lipschutz

Lessons in Journalistic Integrity (TQP0031)

Posted in Braak, Politics with tags , on June 9, 2008 by braak

Someone pointed me to the Huffington Post‘s reporting of this charming little piece of journalism.

Using my own invincible investigative skills, I have delved deep into the training programs of Fox News commentators, analysts, reporters, et cetera, and have discovered the secret to their power.

Let’s say that you, a Fox New Journalist, want to call Barack Obama a terrorist Muslim. Communist. A terrorist, Muslim Communist that likes to kill and eat Christian babies. If you were another news source, you’d investigate Barack Obama and discover that there’s no evidence of any of those characteristics. You’d be stymied!

But if you’re Fox News, you don’t have to be held back by the stifling, oppressive, elitist liberal machine called reality. You can step right up and report whatever it is you think AS THOUGH it were the truth!

How? It’s easy, just ask it. Watch:

Barack Obama engages in a terrorist fist jab with his wife!

DID Barack Obama ENGAGE in a terrorist fist jab with his wife?

Did your investigation about whether or not the Liberals are secretly funding Al-Qaeda operations in Luxembourg peter out? Don’t worry about it!

A secret cabal of Democrats is sending atomic cluster bombs to Oesling!

DID a secret cabal of Democrats SEND atomic cluster bombs to Oesling?

(This is a joke; everyone knows that there’s no such place as Luxembourg.)

Driving a hybrid car causes gay pedophiles to rape boy scouts!

DOES driving a hybrid car CAUSE gay pedophiles to rape boy scouts?

The best part about it is that you never have to actually explain yourself, or even answer the question. If you want, you can spend the entire rest of the segment talking about something else entirely, because Americans can’t pay attention for more than two minu

Japanese Toxin-Sucking Power! (TQP#0030)

Posted in Braak with tags , on June 9, 2008 by braak

This weekend I was watching the Gordon Ramsay marathon on BBC America. For some reason, the BBC America is funded entirely by those crazy “As Seen On TV” entrepreneurs, because every five minutes was a commercial for some outlandish thing (Here’s a sonic scrubber for your car! Here’s a pan that lets you make tiny spherical pancakes! A pill that makes you lose weight! A pill that makes your penis bigger! A pill that makes your hair grow back! A pill that turns you into Batman!).

Television marketing is the quintessential human enterprise. It is based purely on the universal knowledge that there’s no such thing as a free lunch, and the equally-universal resentment of that fact. Is it so hard, Universe, to give me something for nothing JUST THIS FUCKING ONCE? We buy the diet pill whose greatest selling feature is that you don’t have to change your diet or exercise more to lose weight. You don’t have to do anything; just sit around like you were before, watching TV munching on your roast pork joint, take the pill, and POW! Good evening, Mr. Pitt.

My favorite one of these is the Kinoki Foot Pad, which is a pad BASED ON ANCIENT JAPANESE MEDICINE that sucks the toxins out of your body through the soles of your feet.

Oh! They have a website!

It says right at the top “Experience Kinoki’s Natural Power of Nature,” and so you know you’re in for a treat.

The website doesn’t even have any information on it, except that Kinoki is made of “pure and natural” ingredients—so, let’s take a moment to talk about that. “Pure and natural” is a good way to get stupid Americans to buy things. If it’s pure and natural, it’s got to be good, right? Pure is practically the definition of good! And nature—everyone likes nature, right? Natural things are the best!

Squid piss is natural. The venom of the deadly pacific box jellyfish is natural. My ass is natural, but it sure as hell isn’t going to suck the toxins out of your body.

In the commercial, they show a picture of a tree, drawing nutrients up from the soil, and expelling crap back through it (I think?). We’re supposed to liken ourselves to the tree, and I can get behind that. LIKE THE MIGHTY OAK TREE, I will expel toxins from my body! I will draw strength up from the earth! This commercial makes me feel good about myself!

Of course, trees don’t have mouths, stomachs, kidneys, and urinary tracts, which is why they don’t eat food, and also why they need to piss through their roots. Human beings have urethras; one of the many ways in which we are unlike the mighty oak tree.

There’s also a little bit where they show these two charts, and the woman says “According to this independent study, Kinoki foot pads remove toxins from your body!” And on the left side is a bar graph where the bars are labeled things like “Mercury” and “Chromium,” and those bars are very high, and the right chart has bars with the same labels that are lower.

This is retarded, because it doesn’t say which independent study, or who did it, or even HOW they did it. Are those supposed to be before and after charts? The charts for two different people? Were they used on people at all, or tested on the MIGHTY OAK TREE?

Look, we all know how easy it is to make a chart. Watch this:

Everyone knows the scourge of deadly metals is making our hair fall out, our penises shrink, and giving us deadly and unsightly weight gain! But now, using the pure, all-natural power of the internet, Threat Quality can improve your life for the better!

As you can see from this independent study, regularly reading Threat Quality press can reduce your body’s concentrations of dangerous fictional metals by as much as 20%! Call now, and order your own GAURANTEED Threat Quality treatment plan for only $12.95 plus shipping and handling! Order now, time is running out!

Dammit, McClane (TQP #0029)

Posted in Jeff Holland, poetics with tags , on June 6, 2008 by braak
(Posted by Jeff Holland)
(A few of you just read the title of the post and thought this would be about John McCain. Sorry. Maybe next week. Particularly if he keeps on wearing that corpse-face like he has been lately.)
I recently got around to watching Live Free or Die Hard (alternate title: John McClane Versus The Internet), and I realized why I don’t really enjoy action movies that much anymore: I’m more concerned with the people in the car that flipped over Bruce Willis than Bruce Willis himself.

Because reality has shown me their stories are probably more interesting, and definitely more believable.

I’m not making any new statements when I say 9/11 changed action movies – I’m just shocked at how fervently action movies want to change back.

Americans got a first-hand look at how devastating an attack on a city can be, so for a while, big spectacle action flicks weren’t escapist entertainment anymore. They actually seemed kind of cruel, the way they showed massive urban destruction without any sense of concern for the aftermath.

Action movies don’t have the luxury of superhero or sci-fi – they’re supposed to take place in our world. They’ve got some leeway, but ultimately they can’t break too many rules of reality. And because “There are consequences to destruction” had become a primary rule of our reality, action movies had to change. The stakes had to be personal. The characters had to be human. This is how we got the Bourne series, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, and Casino Royale – all films comparatively low on civilian casualties.

But entertainment media can sometimes be pretty bullheaded about change. How do I know this? Rocky Balboa got made.

Which isn’t bad on its own, but its success was enough to send a signal: we’re ready for our old action heroes to return. We’re ready for things to be like they were.

Which is how we got John Rambo (alternate title: Rambo Versus Burma, Even Though It’s Called Myanmar Now).

(The urge to head back the way we came started a lot earlier than that, actually. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s first post-9/11 actioner was called Collateral Damage. You knew from the title alone what you were gonna see.)
So here I sat, watching John McClane fighting valiantly against, well, present-day America. In the first 45 minutes, catastrophic traffic accidents cripple Washington DC. And then the power goes out. But while we know how many stories of personal tragedy and triumph could be mined out of the civilians coping with this destruction – because we fucking saw it happen for real seven years ago – we’re not supposed to be concerned. We’re supposed to be relieved, because John McClane is going to beat up the people responsible.

This isn’t me being cute – this is the actual through-line of the movie. Evil Genius Timothy Olyphant uses The Power of the Internet to empty McClane’s 401K, locate his ex-wife and kids, and basically destroy McClane’s life. But that’s something to worry about tomorrow. Today, McClane is going to find Olyphant and put his old-fashioned boot of justice up Olyphant’s 21st-century-lovin’ ass. Because this is a character who sincerely believes that all this can be fixed by punching someone hard enough.

Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t. I’ve never ridden a fighter jet from the outside, so I can’t really say. All I know is, unlike McClane, I’m worried about the aftermath of the movie. Even after he kills Olyphant…Washington, DC is still utterly fucked. Why doesn’t anyone think about that within the movie? (Justin Long looks at the devastation and feels bad for a second – that’s really not enough.) Hell…why isn’t that the movie?!

So watching big, loud action movies is a bizarre experience for me, because I end up worried about the background noise more than what’s happening up front. Or maybe it’s just that it’s easier for me to relate to getting into a car accident, than shooting a moving car up into the sky to take down a helicopter.

One of these has everyday drama attached. The other is just fucking crazy. I’m just a little surprised that we wanted ridiculous acts of mass destruction back on the screen, when reality in the 21st century is nothing if not the threat of this destruction happening on your very own city.

Showmen’s Rest (TQP #0028)

Posted in Jeff Holland with tags on June 4, 2008 by braak

(Posted by Jeff Holland)

As an occasional traveler of this great, stupid nation, I feel it’s my duty to head to the bizarre bits, the tourist traps and goofy spots nobody ever bothers with anymore. (Which is why me and Pam are the only people you know with first-hand accounts of the World’s Biggest Twine Ball, so, y’know…you’re welcome.)

So here I am in Minneapolis, the more awesome of the twin cities (I assume). But last time I was in this town, not only did we hit the twine ball, we did the sculpture garden and the Mall of America (and if you don’t think the Mall of America is weird, lemme tell you: the Mall of America is weird by virtue of its very BEING).

And the Museum of Questionable Medical Equipment closed a few years ago. So, not much left in the Weird, MN stores.

So I took a leap, and headed out to Showmen’s Rest, a graveyard for circus performers located in the Lakewood Cemetery.

Say that with me: “a graveyard for circus performers.” How could I NOT go?

Map of the grounds in hand, I trudged up one hill after another, fully expecting awesome monuments over each horizon.

Then I got a bit turned around. Enough so that, yes, I stepped over many a plot so as to hasten my way towards the “section 27” dictated by my map.

I looked around, but saw nothing of interest. What the hell was the deal, here?

Finally, I thought I was close enough to ask the groundskeepers, who told me I was where I was looking for.

No bronzed figures of horses ornamented with tassels.

No statues of men shooting out of cannons.

No patron PT Barnum figure, holding his hands out to display the graves of his brethren, gone up to that big top in the sky.

No jokey grave markers, like “They told me to break a leg, but this is ridiculous,” or “When they said ‘Knock ‘em dead,’ I didn’t think they meant me too!”

And not one. Single. Solitary. Clown.

What is there, is this:

More accurately, this:

The poem on the tablet is actually pretty damn sad. All, “Where are the horses?” and so on.

And I wonder, if those markers that once were people knew what their “Showmen’s Rest” was, if they wouldn’t feel a little bit gypped.

I wanted to tell them, “Hell, I came, folks. The allure was enough to drag me uptown on two buses. And hey – an audience of one’s still something, right?” But if they were true showmen, I think they’d want their final resting place to have a bit more pizzazz for anyone who came by.

Rest in peace, Tal Vayo, Minerva Gregg, various Esthers, and all you other awesomely named circus folk. If you’re up in heaven, drag that Jesus fella out for some audience participation. I’ll betcha everyone else is too nervous to do that to him, given, y’know…last time.

Because I love you, oh, reader…

Posted in Braak with tags on June 3, 2008 by braak

There are, what, four of you out there?

I’m keeping you apprised on my quest to become a professional author of fiction.

Of the thirteen query letters I sent out at the beginning of the week, trying for representation for my first novel, five of them came back “no.” One of them was marked “unable to deliver.”

Quest status has been downgraded from “poor” to “dismal.”

Some Things About Comics, and Alan Moore (TQP0026)

Posted in Braak, poetics with tags , on June 2, 2008 by braak

posted by Chris Braak

I wanted to say some things about comics, and about Alan Moore. I was in the bookstore the other day (in between hanging out with some socialist revolutionaries and waiting for my friend’s wedding party at the Drake Hotel to start), and I found myself with some time to kill. I did what any sensible person with a few hours to spend in a bookstore would do–I sat down, and I read some things.

In particular, I read Paul de Fillipo’s Top Ten: Beyond the Farthest Precinct, a sequel, of sorts, to Alan Moore’s original Top Ten series, about the police force in a city made up entirely of ex-superheroes (called, for mysterious- though- probably- copyright- related reasons “science-heroes”).

Now, it’s been a while since I read the original Top Ten, but I remember enjoying it quite a lot. It sort of struck that double chord of empathy and intellectual interest, I think. But like I said, it’s been a couple years (six, I think), so my memory was hazy, and I’ve been conscious, lately, of a tendency to lionize Alan Moore in my memory. That, you know, maybe he’s not all he’s cracked up to be.

I read this Paul De Fillipo comic book, and I thought to myself, “meh, this isn’t really that great, but maybe the original wasn’t that great, either.”

Then, I picked up Alan Moore’s Top Ten: The Forty-Niners, which is his own new Top Ten book. It’s kind of a prequel, set sixty or so years before the original Top Ten, during the founding of the city of “science-heroes.”

Compared to Alan Moore’s book, Paul de Fillipo’s is embarrassingly poor.

In literally every respect, Beyond the Farthest Precinct is an inferior piece of writing. Character, pacing, plot, dialogue–I would be personally ashamed to have written something like this, and to have it necessarily compared to Alan Moore’s own work on the subject.

Reading both of them reminded me what Top Ten was like in the first place.

See, the original series had characters with complex lives–Dust Devil had a mother who needed him to take care of her. This was a minor plot point and a relative bit of color. Jack Phantom was a lesbian–again, character color, a little plot, not much more to it than that. Shock-headed Peter was–I guess “racist” is the right word–racist against robots.

In de Fillipo’s version of the comic, though, these relatively minor characteristics become the defining elements of the characters. Jack Phantom mostly just talks about how she likes women. Dust Devil is constantly receiving calls about his mother. GET IT? SEE? Shock-headed Peter keeps finding extremely irrelevant times to bring up his hatred of robots. GET IT? IT’S BECAUSE HE HATES ROBOTS!

Of course, you get back to Top Ten: The Forty-Niners, and it’s all different. Jetlad is just realizing he’s a homosexual, and this is a big part of the story. It is, in fact, fully a third of the story. It is a characteristic explored through motivated action and language, developed by the plot, instead of inexpertly shoehorned into it. And it’s also not his only defining characteristic–or, rather, being a homosexual isn’t something defined simply by him saying that he likes men a lot. He struggles with his own homophobia, with being attracted to another man, at the same time trying to cope in a new city that he barely understands.

The original Top Ten, and Top Ten: The Forty-Niners are both devoid of the traditional comic-book tropes, taking their plotting and structure from mystery and police procedural novels. There were no secret destinies, not even any “this could be the end of the universe” shit. They were ordinary people who had super-powers, and who were doing their ordinary jobs. Really, many of them didn’t even have very good superpowers, and Alan Moore made no attempt to have them unlock new, “better” powers. Everyone just got what they got, and if your power was that you had a box full of tiny robots, you just made the best of it.

IN FACT! One of the most poignant moments in the original Top Ten is when the Medical Examiner has to tell a tertiary character (Andy “Airbag” Soames) that he has a deadly sexually-transmitted disease. This has no essential relation to the plot; it is a simple side-story about an ordinary person suffering from his poor choices. He is a casualty–in some ways responsible, in some ways blameless–in the constant struggle between life and death that characterizes every world. We never find out what happens to him, though we assume that he dies.

But no! It turns out (in Beyond the Farthest Precinct), the sexually-transmitted disease mutates Andy into a superhuman psychic interdimensional skull monster! And he is going to DESTROY THE UNIVERSE unless one of the other characters EMBRACES HER SECRET DESTINY and discovers POWERS SHE NEVER KNEW SHE HAD!

The Forty-Niners, again by contrast, is a novel about a gang war. Sure, some people in the gang war are vampires, the police have superpowers, there are guys with awesome jet planes, but it’s still just about a gang war. It’s the same dirty, gritty, regular old living world that we’ve always had. Nothing is different just because there are Nazis and vampires and jets everywhere, and that’s what makes it good.

So, to sum up:

Top Ten–excellent. Read it.

Top Ten: The Forty-Niners–excellent, read it.

Top Ten: Beyond the Farthest Precinct–we’d all be better off pretending this never happened.

Alan Moore–knows his fucking business.

Paul de Fillipo–I understand is a widely-respected scifi writer.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,015 other followers