<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, When You Say &#8220;Press&#8221;&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/</link>
	<description>The truth is, you can electrify pretty much anything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD McDonnell</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-4830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JD McDonnell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-4830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loved the article. I&#039;m going through a similar crisis of faith with the publishing industry that you can read about here (if serenely bored, it&#039;s pretty much the same thing you&#039;ve written sans the neat corollary between query letters and slot machines)

http://barbecuediguana.deviantart.com/journal/29699294

Someone up above wrote something along the lines of &quot;how do we separate the crap from the good stuff.&quot;

It astounds me how often this gets said, like a small brick wall that people just smack into and use as an excuse to go no further. 

The answer is the same thing that answers the question of &quot;how do you separate the normally published crap from the good stuff?&quot; 

+reviews - once the major review sources lift their embargo on reviewing POD books there will be no stopping the new publishing revolution. If anything, this seems to be the sole anchor that is holding the old status quo in place.

+graphics - you should never judge a book by its cover, but we always do. And while there have been good books with shitty covers this usually comes from publishers cutting corners. The cover art of the future will need to show the love that the writer has put into the book beneath it, as will the website and the book trailer, and all the other flotsam that hooks peoples attention.

+word of mouth - people talk about the books they love, and no coalition or writers union will be able to hold that back.

+being picked up by major publishers - seriously?

Yes, and this is my view of the future. The slushpile system will be abandoned and replaced by the POD sales figure round up. At the end of the day, publishers are businesses. They respond almost stupidly to sales (ex: anything ghost written for a celebrity). In the future they will watch, or have a computer program watch Amazon and Lulu for breakout novels: ones that somehow manage to sell 1,000 or more copies. Although small, it is actually a pretty astounding number for a POD book, and a loud hint that -hey- there&#039;s something worth printing here. 

Instead of writers badgering the publishers, they will come to us with a proposition to secure publishing rights. And everyone will be happy again, somewhat. If anything, this future means more work on the part of the writer or writing team, but instead of releasing a tsunami of crap (which is what you&#039;ll get if all you ever do is go to Lulu and ask it for a fantasy novel) it may actually open up a new golden age of quality writing. Go figure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the article. I&#8217;m going through a similar crisis of faith with the publishing industry that you can read about here (if serenely bored, it&#8217;s pretty much the same thing you&#8217;ve written sans the neat corollary between query letters and slot machines)</p>
<p><a href="http://barbecuediguana.deviantart.com/journal/29699294" rel="nofollow">http://barbecuediguana.deviantart.com/journal/29699294</a></p>
<p>Someone up above wrote something along the lines of &#8220;how do we separate the crap from the good stuff.&#8221;</p>
<p>It astounds me how often this gets said, like a small brick wall that people just smack into and use as an excuse to go no further. </p>
<p>The answer is the same thing that answers the question of &#8220;how do you separate the normally published crap from the good stuff?&#8221; </p>
<p>+reviews &#8211; once the major review sources lift their embargo on reviewing POD books there will be no stopping the new publishing revolution. If anything, this seems to be the sole anchor that is holding the old status quo in place.</p>
<p>+graphics &#8211; you should never judge a book by its cover, but we always do. And while there have been good books with shitty covers this usually comes from publishers cutting corners. The cover art of the future will need to show the love that the writer has put into the book beneath it, as will the website and the book trailer, and all the other flotsam that hooks peoples attention.</p>
<p>+word of mouth &#8211; people talk about the books they love, and no coalition or writers union will be able to hold that back.</p>
<p>+being picked up by major publishers &#8211; seriously?</p>
<p>Yes, and this is my view of the future. The slushpile system will be abandoned and replaced by the POD sales figure round up. At the end of the day, publishers are businesses. They respond almost stupidly to sales (ex: anything ghost written for a celebrity). In the future they will watch, or have a computer program watch Amazon and Lulu for breakout novels: ones that somehow manage to sell 1,000 or more copies. Although small, it is actually a pretty astounding number for a POD book, and a loud hint that -hey- there&#8217;s something worth printing here. </p>
<p>Instead of writers badgering the publishers, they will come to us with a proposition to secure publishing rights. And everyone will be happy again, somewhat. If anything, this future means more work on the part of the writer or writing team, but instead of releasing a tsunami of crap (which is what you&#8217;ll get if all you ever do is go to Lulu and ask it for a fantasy novel) it may actually open up a new golden age of quality writing. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Damned Blog &#187; Books! Here is what will happen to books! &#124; scribblescribblescribble.com</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Another Damned Blog &#187; Books! Here is what will happen to books! &#124; scribblescribblescribble.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to the end (WHY WOULDN&#8217;T YOU?) and consequently you miss this link, you should still consider buying Braak&#8217;s book. I&#8217;m going to, and I&#8217;ve already read [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the end (WHY WOULDN&#8217;T YOU?) and consequently you miss this link, you should still consider buying Braak&#8217;s book. I&#8217;m going to, and I&#8217;ve already read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threatqualitypress</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[threatqualitypress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have nothing pertinent to say.  Now that blogging is no longer an escape from the tedium of my horrible job, I find my enthusiasm is waning.

I only ever blogged out of &lt;em&gt;spite&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing pertinent to say.  Now that blogging is no longer an escape from the tedium of my horrible job, I find my enthusiasm is waning.</p>
<p>I only ever blogged out of <em>spite</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Holland</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Holland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I give up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HAHAHAHA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1370&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jeff&lt;/a&gt;: Jeff, that&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Merriam-Webster&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-1370" rel="nofollow">Jeff</a>: Jeff, that&#8217;s <em>Merriam-Webster</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Holland</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Holland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is going to be a sticking point with you, isn&#039;t it? Look, it&#039;s in the damn Mirriam Webster dictionary, you&#039;ll just have to cope. 

Perhaps you&#039;d like to say something a little more on-point regarding self-publishing, and/or copyediting your own work?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be a sticking point with you, isn&#8217;t it? Look, it&#8217;s in the damn Mirriam Webster dictionary, you&#8217;ll just have to cope. </p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;d like to say something a little more on-point regarding self-publishing, and/or copyediting your own work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threatqualitypress</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[threatqualitypress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, how is it different from &quot;orienteering&quot;?  I remember that that&#039;s what we called it when I was in the Boy Scouts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, how is it different from &#8220;orienteering&#8221;?  I remember that that&#8217;s what we called it when I was in the Boy Scouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Holland</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Holland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it&#039;s considerably more specific, for one thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s considerably more specific, for one thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threatqualitypress</title>
		<link>http://threatquality.com/2009/01/23/so-when-you-say-press/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[threatqualitypress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threatquality.com/?p=1077#comment-1367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is that different from &quot;orienting&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is that different from &#8220;orienting&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

